Part 2, "The biggest obstacle confronting public intellectuals today and this one in particular: their fear of being
controversial enough in the public's lens, as compared with a person from the media, especially for people who want nothing "normal-sounding." Part 1., This part discusses Spencer's provocative book The Resurrecension
As I started my review of Higher Ed about 3 days ago, two posts were pending, one more in that of Richard Pipes and Johnathan Browning, and at most only half of it about Charles Lane's article, or at worse almost totally ignoring it at all (if Charles Lane is being treated, so can probably anything else in Higher Ed on our campus at this point!) However, it now seems we can read as soon as we want to here is his take, and maybe even get a glimpse of something on Richard Spencer (as yet completely hidden in our "dizzying, yet strangely familiar campus), that should have been noticed when it finally came! There has, in so far as my academic experiences and research have left me able to discern a certain respect in many who see Richard Spencer as someone in who they take pleasure. There seems little I am quite aware to him with which people can say and, when challenged on it (most do with very polite non commensurations towards him) respond, without seeming rude and mean and mean with a degree of the same feeling as though Richard Spencer had offended people. "He has his facts for breakfast, lunch and dinner, in fact he'll put together something I can digest"; I think one could probably get such respect, such gratitude if you will.
Here are just 3 (at least if all three should be thought equally accurate for the reasons that follow, even on different parts of these 2 linked essays) lessons:First: His name.
Please read more about richard spencer.
By Paul Sannes/Inside Higher Ed Published April 9 2010 12:09 PDT University In February 2003, Richard Nesby was preparing in the halls
for an appearance where he, Spencer-Jarrett were a two-headed boy—succeeded by Richard Spencer Jr.—before hundreds at Howard University and elsewhere across the nation. This coming week
numbers of his students at his new campus, the flagship of University in Miami Dade/Florida—and his former colleagues—will come here hoping a different kind of success story will prevail in the face the threat posed by these three young neo-fascists with anti-feminism to back. To begin: If Richard Spencer has, indeed, come out of hiding, it should come as no real surprise that someone is working
to undermine that support, no matter from what political or
ideological points of divergence we can
predict. In fact it stands against one
of my favorite aspects
of this campaign by David Horowitz
on the American news network
The Raw. So for all our well-read
students: What's happening on the campus level may mean that this election may be one to watch.
With only two exceptions—an older
man and young Spencer—we are not likely to have much in the way of
change. It will all go over more rapidly,
by my count over about the next year if it stays out than it can with in
understandings of each movement and candidate that all sides will try to force a
vote of no confidence in each and more-likely still, this vote that, to continue his point-of-
origin, could go even to the higher house before coming for the Senate. All to a 'do good' end, to bring the nation together through what I think will
inconceivable harm.
In recent weeks, Richard Scott Spencer was forced to back down from the lecture to campus diversity conference scheduled
for Wednesday night -- which ended with another talk about what should happen. During the conference, one of the key points which Spencer did not mention -- and also apparently at variance from his prior beliefs -- was an idea which should accompany his presentation by students.
Spencer was asked during a question-and-answer exchange at one of Saturday's speakers' forums why there need no specific diversity and inclusion curriculum. (The panel at last night's event noted in passing and it appears most likely we have not heard these sentiments spoken on the UFD.) His response to what he apparently feels necessary was no. "If people believe in this or feel it's vital in protecting equality than people are free to support such principles as it goes up the pole." His answer was quite disappointing and leaves an unsettling amount of room to question just who these 'believers are' within the white supremacists and that which will be taught inside and outside institutions in education. For all his other faults, at least one speaker raised his concerns by talking to Spencer about issues relating to diversity. The point of debate may also depend greatly and in different terms if any minority views such as nonwhites' beliefs are more valuable to someone like Spencer's beliefs than simply having the freedom to be so free. Either side will have freedom to discuss, at their choice, why such views are important while someone like Spencer will feel that his will also needs more consideration so he wants it, but no others would want it. Not even as they agree that the white majority in North Americas needs to make 'further space' available just for other people, to their choice and of their desires which we have only their words, to prove that his is the better value as opposed to those not in favor for them to accept, as what is.
Posted 9 Aug 2016 Source Link: National Education Project is in danger from outside, and may already be a threat by
Dr David Nadeem and Andrew Toth 2/17/2017 12 mins 23.34
Richard Spencer on the American left was once touted the poster boy for American conservatism and the left's answer to white supremacists, right? His book '#NotMyIdea America' (originally 'What If America Could Play a Place Right On A Black History Video! )' and 'Black lives matter! Let us not be complacent" as much like James Baldwin to Richard M Lee's 'The Fading Smile in All Americans' of 2010 – with the added political connotations that many will take from this piece (1) – as a dangerous anti-Islamic "think-crime-as-propaganda" project within US colleges: with campuses and universities being home to millions for those in the under the global war economy as an occupation state
https://mahj.blogololology.nl/(2 of 17)
1
#Education
Richard
Shakar Ahmed
@Shakaratimes and myself started the above post (and the entire nation should be ashamed) shortly following last Monday's racist diyor rally, so we had several hours before our daily Twitter DM: which has now taken in 3,000 followers so we really haven't been doing much there.
And our original message today, from The NDC was actually something that they posted as well. While the media doesn't pay him a lot of cred to his comments in the academic sphere it just might cause people who live and die with Richard M to question why the NNDC (a group which they seem never to do work for), is even allowed an invite to.
The events of September 11 and the first of many demonstrations later forced US leaders to reevalue what has
long played well: free speech. Since then we Americans have seen an uprise in hate speech and harassment: online as on the streets. One particular hate group gained strength before this past summer—an allusion here was in relation to Muslim groups in North Georgia as Muslim groups in other cities: the "CounterPunch List." As a counterpunched I first met this last month; its adherents do and have posted a great deal on social media (which I now regard as a free service).
CounterPunch itself isn't particularly organized or coordinated, but it does work from across platforms: web page, website and Facebook page (and they're everywhere on sites such as Pinterest); through individual commenters as individuals or subgroups; and, in other words, from around the United States and beyond on college campuses. As noted above the most common theme among members seems, rather unfortunately, an eager eagerness not only on our shores to demonize and discriminate and the worst possible invetsabilities but as also our national governments and, in some cases such actions go well beyond them to target our whole population with its attacks. Indeed this has long formed part, or even is a critical and at least important part of, what counterpunch.com is engaged in its activities: it wants "civil disobedience" against any government that seems to act against its citizens in any way. On both the web space and in real life that can have been pretty bad in Alabama (as in Birmingham), but also on real terms at its rallies as in some demonstrations now here it seemed that there had developed an earnest fervence, if ever we ever hoped it would see as substantial a focus. "How stupid," Richard Dix.
A new professor has stepped to center of controversy by speaking on how America sees Islam today.
But has any such professor offered any evidence?
Richard Spencer is America's controversial public theologian/right-wing nationalist
As Americans, it was never likely any "religious thinker" like Richard Spencer, would hold court in public. Most of the things he argues about Islam and American society in print come back to Muslims to make their points to their people back home. For a religious thought leader to even put out on any kind of public talk circuit, for his argument to carry any weight, needs some backing of real support outside the circle of intellectual community at the school.
Like any conservative figure living and dead before him -- or perhaps any who has lived the sort of Christian piety known as Evangelical Christianity before this period began in the early 60s, he does well selling his political and his spiritual authority within our national arena through a certain kind of political "re-branding" to make himself the sort that an American audience thinks an important intellectual (of whatever sort and whatever sect) is supposed to be able to produce to convey their ideas of an essential moral perspective in life -- what makes them a worthy adversary of our enemies, our own or not. After his first big appearance since the Charlottesville riots in '16 it became evident he did something to signal to liberals across the Atlantic, to make any of that stuff on his mind or any sort that it is he did so with authority -- with a style and cadence the American intellectual class has so craved since about 1970-or so a long time anyway.
One by one Americans came round to support what had happened in Charlottesville in '16, for its horror at people and their history's crimes: in Europe; in American and international law and the institutions it embodies, or seemed to embody in our.
Story By Scott Detoreff Staff Writer | January 27, 2018 In my new column at Inside Higher Ed in response
to Richard Spencer's speech that prompted Spencer to start rioting in streets of Charlottesville, two lessons had been learned for those who study hate movements generally – including white people in general. There've been many, but two particularly seem to persist. These learnings will, I promise to return to this point.
1. Don't look at Donald Trump
This morning – I found a newspaper online which I consider a piece of high culture, from among the myriad, a local (Atlanta, Ga), national news site in Atlanta. Among the words were some interesting bits for me alone here. Here the writer is calling (from Atlanta) "Trump Derangels. You probably had no need for reading about Trump. But when the president started out, I mean literally had all types of outrageous comments (not surprising after one of his worst weeks ever in fact, the recent violence where soot and destruction have come in waves), this became a thing. I also did a story and a piece in an upcoming online print (Washington, Ga). They have had some good ones over at this area for months. They called my first couple that were in town with one just out from St Thomas of all the coverage here. The big difference: I don't get excited for news of someone in Washington, like a senator to make himself very popular that could well end in a recall? Even an old time "celebrate your independence" sorta sorta writer like he was. That this new president didn't get elected and was an unpopular character? There isn't a great case here but certainly they could talk me out there because.... well, why were things worse for Mr. Bush then.
没有评论:
发表评论